By 
No time for reading the blog? Give it a listen on Spotify.
Advaita Vedanata teaches that the very names we assign to things create our perception of a separated world, obscuring the unified whole.
Take a moment to look around you. You see a screen, a desk, a cup of coffee. You feel the fabric of your shirt, hear the hum of a computer. The world presents itself as a collection of distinct, separate objects. This seems so obvious, so undeniably true, that to question it feels absurd.
But what if this entire experience of a fragmented reality is built upon a fundamental error? What if the primary architect of this world of separation isn’t some external force, but something we use every second without a second thought: language?
Advaita Vedanta points to this exact problem. It introduces a profound concept called Nama-Rupa (Name and Form), which suggests that the world of separate things exists primarily because we have given them separate names.
What is Nama-Rupa?
The Sanskrit word Nama means “name.” Rupa means “form.” Together, they represent the dualistic process through which we perceive and interact with reality.
Imagine for a moment the unmanifested, underlying reality—what Advaita calls Brahman. It is a unified, limitless, homogenous field of existence-consciousness-bliss (Sat-Chit-Ananda). It is without parts, without division, a single, whole reality.
How do we get from that to this—a world of countless things?
This is where Nama-Rupa comes in. It is the mechanism of manifestation. Think of Brahman as pure, colorless light. Nama-Rupa is the prism that splits this single beam into the spectrum of a million different colors. The prism doesn’t create the light, but it creates the appearance of separation within it.
Rupa (Form) is the specific shape, structure, or quality that a portion of this reality temporarily takes. It’s the unique arrangement of atoms that makes a lump of gold appear as a ring instead of a necklace.
Nama (Name) is the conceptual label, the idea, the word we assign to that particular form. “Ring.” “Necklace.” “Bracelet.”
The crucial insight here is that these two are inseparable. A form begs for a name, and a name conjures a form. Together, they create the illusion of a separate, independent object.
The Superimposition of Separation
Let’s use the classic Advaita analogy of the rope and the snake.
You are walking down a dimly lit path and see a coiled shape. Your mind, conditioned by past experiences and language, immediately shouts, “Snake!”
In that instant, the word “snake” superimposes an entire reality onto the vague form. Fear arises. Your heart pounds. You see fangs, scales, and movement where there is none.
But then, someone turns on a light. You see it’s just a rope. The word “rope” now replaces “snake,” and the fear vanishes instantly.
What changed? The underlying reality (the object on the path) didn’t change. Only the name and the meaning you attached to it changed. The name created a world of danger and separation (a thing that can harm “you”). The corrected name revealed the harmless, simple reality.
This is what we do every moment of our lives. We experience the undivided reality of Brahman, but our minds, through the prism of Nama-Rupa, superimpose a world of separate objects upon it.
How Language Fractures the World
Language is inherently dualistic. To say “this” implies “that.” To define “good” requires the concept of “bad.” To be “me” requires “you” and “them.”
It Creates Boundaries: The single, flowing reality has no boundaries. But the word “tree” creates a mental boundary. We separate the “tree” from the “ground” it grows from, the “air” it breathes, and the “sunlight” that feeds it. In reality, they are one inseparable process. The name creates an artificial isolation.
It Concretizes the Temporary: The forms (rupa) of the world are transient, ever-changing patterns in the cosmic flow. A wave rises and falls back into the ocean. Language takes this temporary wave and gives it a permanent-seeming name, making us believe in its solid, independent existence. We forget it is, and always was, the ocean itself.
It Points, But Is Not the Thing Itself: The word “water” will never quench your thirst. The menu that says “chocolate cake” is not the cake itself. We constantly confuse the conceptual map (the names) with the actual territory (reality). We live so deeply in the world of names that we lose touch with the nameless suchness of direct experience.
The Spiritual Implication: Moving Beyond the Map
This isn’t to say language is “bad.” It is an incredibly useful tool for navigating the transactional world (vyavaharika satya). You need to ask someone to “please pass the salt,” not utter a poetic ode to the undifferentiated oneness of all things.
The problem arises when we mistake the utility of language for ultimate truth (paramarthika satya). We believe so completely in the story of separation told by our names that we suffer the consequences: loneliness, conflict, desire, and fear—all emotions that depend on the belief in a separate self (jiva) in a world of separate objects.
The spiritual path of Jnana Yoga in Advaita is, in many ways, the process of using the intellect to see through the illusion created by Nama-Rupa. Practices like Neti, Neti (not this, not this) involve discarding every name and form you can attribute to yourself—”I am a body,” “I am my thoughts,” “I am successful,” “I am a failure”—to discover what remains when all labels fall away.
What remains is the nameless, formless awareness that you are—the silent witness upon which the entire dance of Nama-Rupa appears, like the single screen upon which all the diverse movies of life play out.
The next time you name something—a feeling, a person, a problem—pause for a moment. See if you can glimpse the reality before the label was applied. See if you can experience the world not as a collection of nouns, but as a verb—a single, flowing, inseparable process of becoming.
You might just catch a glimpse of the unity that language, in its necessary function of dividing to define, has cleverly concealed all along.
